愤怒的小鸡赚钱版

愤怒的小鸡红包版，配以精美的游戏画面，可爱的风格，有不同颜色的小鸡、猫头鹰、鸟雀等，消除就可以领取红包奖励了。

愤怒的小鸡赚钱版特点

1、趣味性十足的闯关大作战，看看谁能第一个顺利的过关，用自己的实力赢得红包。

2、轻松耐玩的烧脑大作战，体验一场十分过瘾的连线挑战，顺利通关之后还能领取红包。

3、数以百计的不同难度级别等待着您的挑战，级别越慢，每个级别的时间越短。

愤怒的小鸡赚钱版点评

1、Q可爱的小动物带着爱

2、炫目华丽的特效

3、清新美丽甜美的画风

4、意外刺激障碍

愤怒的小鸡赚钱版是真的吗

愤怒的小鸡虽然也属于消除类小游戏，不过在玩法上有点不一样，可以跨区移动，玩的时候注意看教程。个人实测看了两个视频得到4000红包劵，后面应该会变小，能拿多少算多少吧。

愤怒的小鸟vs小鸡？美国一餐厅商标侵权知名手游

即使不玩手机游戏的人也应该都听过“愤怒的小鸟”这款游戏。从iOS应用程序起家，愤怒的小鸟已经从游戏领域延伸到电影、儿童节目、烹饪书籍，甚至食品行业。其与餐厅“愤怒的小鸡”商标侵权异议案件正是集中在食品领域。

Angry Birds Trademark Infringement Case

愤怒的小鸟商标侵权案

Angry Birds is owned by Rovio Entertainment. The company has several registered trademarks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and many of them are directly mentioned in the Notice of Opposition filed by the company on December 7, 2020. This filing targets an application filed by Alexander Lee and Sang Kuk Park for Angry Chicken.

愤怒的小鸟归罗维奥娱乐公司所有。该公司在美国专利商标局（USPTO）拥有多个注册商标，该公司在2020年12月7日提起的异议中涉及其中大部分注册商标，异议的对象正是愤怒的小鸡。

Many oppositions involve brands in the same industry, but in this case, the case pits an entertainment company against a restaurant. The application for Angry Chicken references a Korean chicken restaurant. And while the two brands may seem unrelated, Rovio is claiming that the goods and services at issue are related enough to cause consumer confusion.

大多时候商标异议发生在同一行业，但是在这个案件中，发生异议的双方是娱乐公司和一家餐厅。愤怒的小鸡援引一家韩国炸鸡店作为自己的店名来源。虽然这两个品牌看起来似乎没有什么相关性，但罗维奥娱乐公司声称愤怒的小鸡餐厅提供的产品和服务足够让消费者产生误会。

How Does a Restaurant Infringe on a Game?

餐厅如何侵权游戏？

If the application for Angry Chicken had been made in 2009 – the year Angry Birds was first released – there may have been no legitimate claim of trademark infringement. At the time, Rovio’s newest gaming brand had yet to gain international attention. Since that time, however, the Angry Birds name has shown up just about everywhere.

如果愤怒的小鸡餐厅在2009年申请商标-同年愤怒的小鸟首次发布，可能就不会有任何商标侵权的法律问题。在那时罗维奥娱乐公司的最新游戏品牌还没有获得全世界关注，而现在愤怒的小鸟已经出现在各个角落了。

From children’s footwear to Angry Birds minigolf, the brand has expanded far outside its original footprint. The Angry Birds trademark is now on several edible products such as snack foods, cake toppers, candy decorations and even a line of sauces. This is where Rovio claims a likelihood of confusion is likely to exist.

从儿童鞋帽到迷你高尔夫，愤怒的小鸟已经将品牌扩展到很多领域，包括食品类的零食、蛋糕、糖果、系列酱汁。正是在这个领域罗维奥娱乐公司认为消费者可能会产生误会。

One of the key considerations of whether consumer confusion is likely – a primary element of trademark infringement – is whether a company might expand into other product lines. In the case of Angry Birds, this has already happened. The megabrand also claims that trademark dilution would occur if the Angry Chicken trademark were granted.

消费者是否可能会产生误会是判定商标侵权的首要因素，而这取决于一个公司是否会扩展到其他产品领域，在愤怒的小鸟一案中正是这种情况。愤怒的小鸟称，若愤怒的小鸡商标被核准注册，其品牌形象会被稀释。

What Happens Now in the Angry Bird Trademark Case?

愤怒的小鸟商标侵权异议目前进展如何？

Only two months have passed since the nationwide release of Angry Birds sauce, but the brand certainly had a foothold in food products before that point. Because of this, Rovio may have a legitimate case against the applicant for Angry Chicken. This case may be strengthened further if Rovio can prove that the Angry Chicken logo looks similar to that of Angry Birds.

愤怒的小鸟两月前在全美发售系列酱汁，但是该品牌在此之前已经在食品行业站稳脚跟，因此罗维奥娱乐公司向愤怒的小鸡餐厅品牌提出异议。如果罗维奥娱乐公司能证明愤怒的小鸡品牌logo与愤怒的小鸟形象类似，该案件将会被进一步加强。

While the Angry Chicken application was for an intent to use trademark, the company appears to have been using the name since at least 2017. The restaurant brand has until January 16, 2021 to respond to the opposition notice, and if the larger entertainment corporation is successful, the restaurant may need to rethink its name and branding.

虽然愤怒的小鸡近期才以商标形式申请注册，但该公司至少从2017年就开始使用这个名字。这家餐厅可以在2021年1月16日之前对异议进行答辩，如果娱乐公司获胜，这家餐厅只能重新起名做品牌。